On 2001.12.11 02:17 Curtis L. Olson wrote:
> Martin Olveyra writes:
> > This is the cvs log message I want to refer to:
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > Log Message:
> > Small tweaks to initialization sequence and logic so we can default to
> > a top level aircraft def file (c172-set.xml)
> > 
> > preferences.xml or --aircraft= or any other property setting mechanism
> can
> > be used to set the property "/sim/aircraft".  After all options and
> config
> > files are parsed, the contents of /sim/aircraft is expanded into a
> > *-set.xml
> > file and loaded.
> > ----------------------------------------------------
> > I synced to the last CVS Flightgear source and base.
> > Then I changed the value of the tag <aircraft> to c310, so to load for
> > defect the cessna 310 instead of the 172.
> > Then, run fgfs --fdm=jsb (my favourite flight model. I also noticed
> that
> > the default flight model has setted back to larcsim)
> > But, the change in the <aircraft> tag value doesn't take effect. The
> c172
> > is loaded instead.
> 
> We made a couple changes in quick succession (hopefully learning from
> our, well my mistakes, as I went along.)
> 
> The /sim/aircraft property has been eliminated.
> 
> preferences.xml <include>'s the default aircraft (c172-set.xml).  If
> you specify --aircraft=xyz, the corresponding config file is loaded
> and the properties it refers to are set immediately.  So any
> subsequent command line options will override what came out of the
> aircraft config file.
> 
I understand know the origin of the problem.

So, the /sim/aircraft property has been eliminated but the <aircraft> tag
in the cvs version of preferences.xml is still there, with the value c172.
Also, in the same file I see the tag <sim
include="Aircraft/c172-yasim-set.xml">, and not c172-set.xml, as you say.

_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to