Christian Mayer wrote:
> 
> Alex Perry wrote:
> >
> > > (Here, I try to estimate the "download size" when doing
> > > my first ever csv update, on slow time-metered isdn.
> >
> > CVS (it'll take you a few weeks to get the hang of typing it right 8-)
> > is a very efficient method of doing the transfer, but it is not compressed.
> 
> Isn't there a option (I think it's -Z<number> with number = 1...9) to
> compress normal CVS?
> 

-z3 (note case) gives the best compression/performance ratio.  Higher
numbers may produce slightly better compression but require more grunt
on the server.

Cheers,
Bernie

_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to