Alex Perry wrote: > > > > isn't. It's not a big deal for a linux box to be up this long I know, > > > and I'm not trying to start a big uptime thread, but given our past > > > history of flakiness of service I thought it was worth pointing out. > > > > Well I would've had you beat hands down ;-) if it wasn't for the fact that the > > person who collects and manages our tapes rebooted the email server a couple > > weeks ago because she was having trouble bringing up the previous nights > > backup log. It's always good to have your best and brightest handling the > > most important jobs. Last I checked on that one it was 280 days and that was > > quite a long time ago (maybe even last summer). > > Well, all I can say is ... counting California uptime is a roulette game on > power cuts, or very expensive. Show me UPS that will keep a computer running > for four hours that costs less than the computer it's protecting ...
Well you'd normally have a disel generator for these power losses (+ an USV for the time the disel engine needs to start). And these aren't too expensive. CU, Christian -- The idea is to die young as late as possible. -- Ashley Montague Whoever that is/was; (c) by Douglas Adams would have been better... _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
