> Alex Perry wrote: > >>Think of it this way: a YASim aircraft will be as close to the real > >>airplane as the real one is to any other aircraft of the same general > >>class. That's good enough for me. And in a lot of situations > >>(military aircraft in particular), this is as good as we're going to > >>get anyway. There isn't any public performance data for these beasts. > >> > > > > How about this ? > > JSB will be exact for every situation that is known and flight tested, > > but may have odd and/or unrealistic behavior outside normal flight. > > (Shhht, don't let Jon hear this!)
Ha! Actually, when we get around to it, we do want to be plausible off-nominal, too. Jon _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
