Melchior FRANZ writes: >There has at least >to be a "suppression" rule for every such C++ violation. I've >already added some entries in my plib.supp file, because the >plib developers >don't seem to be keen to fix it.
Hey that's completely unfair ! You have made exactly 2 posts to the PLib list, both yesterday I'll agree that you got 'one' rather curt reply from a 'self appointed' 'overseer' of the project who FWIW IMHO generates a lot of noise on the list but that is another story >(And they have a lot of such sloppy code.) Without examples that is IMHO completely out of line and as is the case with most Open Source projects 'worthy' patches are usually accepted :-) >BTW: one real bug was already fixed in plib thanks to my >valgrind tests on fgfs. :-) Which for the record was the only 'actual' patch you have submitted and was 'speedily' incorporated as it was as you say an actual bug, albeit a harmless one for the current FGFS code tree. Cheers Norman _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
