Jim Wilson writes:
> I've been working toward this sort of thing...slowly severing the ties between
> the model code and the viewer so that we can have multiples of both.  The new
> viewer interface will make it possible to have multiple FDM's and changes I'm
> planning for the model code over the next week will make it entirely
> autonomous.  Already I have it generating its own local matrix (had to for the
> tower view).   Once this is done we can see what we have and figure out a
> system for managing the components.
> 
> As for Justin's project, rendering the moving ship should be quite easy once
> all I have planned now for the viewer/model is done (probably within a week).
>  All that will be necessary is something that will update the position and
> orientation values for the ship.  It can be a simple as a script that updates
> properties through the tcp interface every half second.
> 
> The bigger problem (or so it seems to me :-)) is the one Andy brought up.  How
> you model stopping on a moving runway.

That's for the FDM guys to worry about. :-)

Curt.
-- 
Curtis Olson   IVLab / HumanFIRST Program       FlightGear Project
Twin Cities    [EMAIL PROTECTED]                  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Minnesota      http://www.menet.umn.edu/~curt   http://www.flightgear.org

_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to