On Mon, 8 Apr 2002 13:01:09 BST, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 
<20020408120149.CJOW18448.wmpmta03-app.mail-store.com@wmpmtavirtual>:

> started the approach. She then said '...and this is how we slow down
> in a hurry'.  Adjusting the prop RPM lever and throttle to get us from
> 145 knots to 80 in around 4 seconds. Very impressive!  Is this

..what?  No sideslip?  ;-)

..we do _reverse_ props in FG?

> modelled in FGFS? The ride ended for me as she put down smoothly in a
> 15 knot/70 degree crosswind and stopped the 'plane in what looked like
> less than 150 metres.  I hopped out of the plane (using the co-pilot
> door and steps for once!) with a grin from ear-to-ear.  Much to the
> dismay of my fellow skydivers who regard aircraft as a necessary evil.
> One other thing I noticed during my flight was that she was constantly
> adjusting the throttle,RPM, etc. levers to reduce the ground noise as
> much as possible.  They did indeed have an affect on the volume of
> noise produced by the aircraft. Is the noise linked to the torque or
> just the RPM and angle of the prop? Next time I will make an effort to

..primarily rpm, then air loads, tip speeds approach Mach 1.  
Also, noise frequency plays in, for airport survival, you want 
big slow turning props.  Not 11" toothpicks turning 18000 rpm.

..firing 1/2" thru 40mm ammo at drones with 13" picks turning 
around 8-10 krpm, returns nice snaps from shock waves meeting 
each other.  Sounds pretty much like bullets hitting a target
at a shooting range, sitting in the target pit.

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.


_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to