On Thursday, April 18, 2002, at 09:19 PM, Curtis L. Olson wrote:

> Anyone up for a 0.7.10 release sometime soon?

Oh, oh, ME!  I will need to beat on my interface between our (at work) 
proprietary FDM and FlightGear's display first.  I've let it languish 
since the 0.7.9 release, anything I should look out for (I still need to 
be able to provide time of day to FlightGear)?  I'll try to check out the 
interface this weekend.

> If anyone wants a real
> time wasting discussion, what do people think about switching from
> 0.7.10, 0.7.11, 0.7.12, etc. to going 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3,
> that way it looks like our development is moving at 10x the speed.  Or
> perhaps I should say that our current number scheme makes the
> development look like it is proceeding at 0.1x the speed it actually
> is. :-)

The problem I see with the 0.X release is that it makes FlightGear look 
like beta software (beta because X > 2).  Of course, the SourceForge page 
says it is in beta, but...  If the consensus is that FlightGear should be 
considered beta, what capabilities need to be there for the "production" 
release?  Sorry, I've been doing releases at work and I've been dealing 
with those kinds of questions.

Jonathan Polley


_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to