David Luff writes: > I personally much prefer the second (embedded example). There's also > taxiway data needed as well - the thing could get *very* big by the time > its finished.
Right. We'll probably want to split it into several files, possibly with an index as Alex and Andy have suggested. In the most extreme case, we could have one file for each airport. All the best, David -- David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
