> I think we should look closely on their conclusion in their reflection: > > **** > In conclusion, the FlightGear flight simulator is a very nice flight sim > package that offers great features (for free), but very poor > extensibility with very few user-friendly tools and source code that is > geared towards a particular operating system (Linux) instead of being > truly cross-platform. For the purposes of modifying FlightGear for other > types of simulations or for virtual prototyping, I recommend choosing a > different software package. > **** > > CU, > Christian
Hmm. I didn't see this. Right away I wonder about two things: 1) Their motivations. 2) Their true qualifications that might lend credibility to their conclusions. Funny, I sort of feel that I've had better experience trying to run FlightGear on Windows. I'll have to look closer at their web page. Maybe. Doesn't sound like they offer much in the way of objective analysis. Do these guys have any idea what FlightGear is being used for? Jon
smime.p7s
Description: application/pkcs7-signature
