So, I am on the verge of 'snapping' with respect to our current
aeronautical data, and am wondering how to proceed. I was looking at
what at other software does for their aeronautical data, and most of
the FS2k2 ones I know about are getting their data from:
http://www.navdata.at/
Now, those data sets are all being derived from the DAFIF, so it
naturally occurs to me .. can we just do the same thing ourselves? Most
critically, as far as I can gather, the DAFIF data contains lots of
data we don't use right now that would be really desirable for me, such
as airspace boundaries and classes (even the KLN-89b tracks those) in
addition to a big library of STARs and SIDs (plus the airway data I
need right now).
So ... what sort of approach should I be investigating? Would we want
to support loading the 'raw' DAFIF data into flightgear, so people can
just download it directly to update to a new AIRAC cycle, or is that
way too much data to contemplate? I'm still trying to get a handle on
the data format and how much of it is useful / useless to us at
runtime, so any / all information people have would be gratefully
received.
Also, if there's some other source for this kind of data we should be
looking at, please let me know. Are there advantages to the data from
Robin Peel that I should be aware of before I merrily start building
replacement code? How (in)complete is the DAFIF outside the land of
free + home of the brave, for example?
H&H
James
--
We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
- re: [Flightgear-devel] DAFIF / Robin Peel's data James Turner
- re: [Flightgear-devel] DAFIF / Robin Peel's data David Megginson
- Re: [Flightgear-devel] DAFIF / Robin Peel's data James Turner
- Re: [Flightgear-devel] DAFIF / Robin Peel's d... David Megginson
- [Flightgear-devel] DAFIF / Robin Peel's data Hoyt A. Fleming
