David Megginson writes:
> 
> Norman Vine writes:
> 
>  > This should work fine, the only thing I am worried about is that it
>  > seems as if every sub component of FGFS is passing a double dt in
>  > both the initialization and the update function.  Then locally
>  > storing a double elapsed variable to compare against.
> 
> There might be some legacy code that does that, but nothing recent
> should.  The subsystem manager automatically takes care of minimum
> time slices: for example, if you want to make sure that a subsystem is
> never updated more than 5 times per second, you would just do this:
> 
>   globals->add_subsystem("my-subsystem", 
>                          new MySubsystem,
>                          FGSubsystemMgr::GENERAL,
>                          0.2);
> 
> The subsystem manager automatically takes care of the timeslice, and
> will not invoke the subsystem's update method until at least 0.2
> seconds has elapsed.

Yes this is better but ... you are still checking every possible event
at every iteration and doing a quadword add compare and store
each time

The event queue model is more efficient esp when you get many
subsytems Linux's success as a RT platform has demonstrated 
this well :-)

Cheers

Norman


_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to