"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin Spott writes: >> Maybe sometime someone finds the time to 'normalize' this interface to make >> it platform independent ;-)
> Could you be more specific? The routines already support network byte > order, however there are cases (i.e. interfacing to an external perl > script using pack/unpack, where network byte order is not desirable) > so I'd like to keep this optional. O.k., I understand. But what am I going to do when the 'client' runs on a different platform with different byte order where an int probably has a different size (say a PPC750) ? You know that I can't decide to stick to one plaform ;-) It's just a thought with platform interoperability in mind. But if I really start flight trainig this idea probably becomes obsolete because I won't have the time and money to proceed with my project .... Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! -------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
