David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Jim Wilson writes: > > > BTW, we could use a second DME. I was going to look at that at some point. > > Does that sound reasonably straight forward from what you recall of it? > > It would be very little work. I need to modularize the whole > Instruments and Systems directories -- twins typically have two vacuum > pumps and two alternators, for example, and transport aircraft have > duplicates of most of the primary instruments. >
Semi-related, it'd be nice to have airports with backcourse glide paths supported too (e.g. LAX, JFK). Probably the data is there, IIRC at LAX we're getting the GS on the backcourse side, but the identifier is from the front course, or the flag is reversed...can't remember which. Best, Jim _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
