On 8/14/03 at 10:14 AM Martin Spott wrote: >Arnt Karlsen wrote: > >> ..can these use tarballs named .tgz instead of .tar.gz etc ? > >I'd vote for another approach. >PowerArchiver for Windows, unlike WinZip, _is_ able to deal with .tar.gz >archives - at least Version 6.11 does (definitely, just tested).
Um, Winzip deals just fine with tar.gz, and has done for many versions, if you ignore the fact that it leaves a temporary copy of the tar file in the temp dir each time it extracts one. There was a problem a while ago that Netscape 3/4.x would rename the extension tar.gz to something wierd that the archiver wouldn't recognise, which might possibly be alleviated by using .tgz instead, but how many people use older Netscapes now? Cheers - Dave _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
