On Wednesday 13 August 2003 19:16, Frederic Bouvier wrote: > Lee Elliott wrote: > > On Wednesday 13 August 2003 17:59, Martin Spott wrote: > > > "Jon Berndt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Somehow I managed to build flightgear and end up with a 42 MB > executable. > > > > > > Did you try to strip that beast ? > > > > > > Martin. > > > -- > > > Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are > ! > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > The last time I looked (until just now) I was getting a 40+MB executable > too. > > However, the last one I did, yesterday with CXXFLAGs set up for an Athlon > XP, > > has come in at just 5.6MB. > > > > Obviously, I'm totally ignorant as why this is:) > > Is it working ? 5.6MB or 56MB ? > > -Fred
5,672,301 bytes - yes it's working. I thought the 40+MB executables were on the big side, but I was even more surprised when I just checked it and found it so small. It's the first update I've done since the new dusk lighting effects were put in and that clearly demonstrated to me that I'm running a new executable. The only difference between my last compile and the previous ones was to set up the CFLAG and CXXFLAG environment variables for an Athlon XP cpu (-O2 -march=athlon-xp -m3dnow mfpmath=sse) Is it possible that setting those variables has overridden something else that results in much larger executables? LeeE _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
