David Luff writes: > Hmm, comparing the old default.apt with the new runways.dat for KSQL, it > appears that the runway orientation has been altered to be correct now (and > presumably the position also) but that the taxiways have been left as they > were. I can redo the taxiway positions and orientations, but not in the > next couple of weeks, which might encompass 0.9.3? At the risk of sounding > like a luddite, can I suggest that the tile be regenerated with the old, > incorrect runway, for this release, since it looks terrible as is, it > looked great as was, it's practically the nearest destination to the > default startup, and its the location of the FG flying manual. > > This is by no means meant as any disrespect to the work thats gone in to > getting the new airport data and STRM data into the scenery - I think its a > fantastic effort :-) and glitches are the price of progress, I just want to > suggest that given the importance of KSQL within the base package we could > maybe regress the runway just for this release... > > IMHO of course!
The best thing to do would be to submit runway/taxiway data reports (and fixes if possible) to Robin Peel. He runs the master data repository and that's where the data ultimately needs to be fixed. Regards, Curt. -- Curtis Olson HumanFIRST Program FlightGear Project Twin Cities curt 'at' me.umn.edu curt 'at' flightgear.org Minnesota http://www.menet.umn.edu/~curt http://www.flightgear.org _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
