Matevz Jekovec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > >I posted the table because I was hoping the "keyboard guru" would identify > >himself. If there is no such guru, then we can build a knowledge base > >starting with collecting similar tables for every language. When "enough" > >tables are completed we can put them all together in an HTML table. > > > > > My 2 cents: > Isn't there any way to link key bindings directly to key numbers, not > their key table? Then, we should make a drawing of a keyboard and have > key bindings drawn to every button, with different colours for > alt/ctrl/shift combinations. This is the drawing we should publish it to > the net, pdf, main 0.9.3 install etc. The main keyboard model used > should be the default US keyboard layout. (I think it is the most common > one, the most known one if nothing else). >
I'm not sure...I think it is a glut function though, so it might be limited. Related to this, it seems there should be a layer of separation between the bindings and the actual keys. The bindings should be named and the mappings should just be a table with the key/character value and the name of the binding. Then it'd be easy to have multiple language keyboard files and we wouldn't have to worry about messing with the scan codes (which could not provide a "perfect" solution anyway). It would also be easier to switch bindings around to user preference using a pui dialog down the road. Best, Jim _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
