Bernie Bright writes:
> Haven't we seen this or something like it before? Instead of "fixing" the
> code every time wouldn't it be easier to supply the missing comparison
> functions for your platform:
> > inline bool
> operator!=( const std::string& lhs, const char* rhs )
> {
> return lhs.compare( rhs ) != 0;
> }
> > inline bool
> operator!=( const char* lhs, const std::string& rhs )
> {
> return rhs.compare( lhs ) != 0;
> }
> > Other comparisons could be added if required.
Good idea. Erik?
I'll take a look at it when I have some time.
If I get it working I'll scan the code for these problems and remove them also.
Erik
_______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
