On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, David Luff wrote:

> Could this be a gotcha with how the heading is specified in runways.dat eg
> 54.64 vs 234.64?

Probably - I hadn't really investigated - I just noticed it when taking
the screenshots, and was going to try and track it down tonight.

-- 
Jon Stockill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to