David Culp wrote: > Unless you fly into someplace below sea level, where the floor of > -0.01 is -1.
And that's wrong? Why? Mild flame time: truncate-toward-zero is one of those things like acos/asin/atan that you want to avoid like the plague. It has almost no mathematical meaning (its output space is non-linear -- zero is overrepresented) and gets you into trouble more often than not. What are we using it for? And why won't floor or ceil work instead? The only "legitimate" use I can think of for trunc() on a negative number is to emulate a FPU float to int conversion without going through an integer register. Andy _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
