Jon S. Berndt wrote:
> Do we need a standard Interface Control Document that formalizes the
> FlightGear/FDM interface?
Sounds like a good idea to me. I'd propose the following two
requirements:
1.) It should be specified via property names, rather than as a C++
interface. This is much easier to support across multiple
codebases, and and stuff in flight.cxx is complicated enough
already.
2.) It should be minimal. One of the nice things about having
multiple FDMs is that their intersection serves as a good
indication of what is actually important. The obscure stuff that
is unique to the different FDMs can be treated as prototype code.
Andy
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
