> > Would anyone be interested in an autoflight subsystem that acts as a
> > higher-level controller of the autopilot?  If been thinking of
> > making one to avoid lots of nasal code [...]
> Is this exactly the kind of high level glue task that a scripting
> language is good for?  Honestly, my thinking would be exactly the
> opposite: replace the C++ stuff with Nasal/properties where possible.

Nothing personal -:)
One problem is I know C++, and I barely know nasal.  I don't even know if what 
I want to do is possible with nasal.  I can only spend so many days playing 
with it, so C++ would be most efficient for me.  

David Culp

Flightgear-devel mailing list

Reply via email to