On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 22:08:42 +0200 Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kalle Valo wrote: >> >> If you are going to make a new release, just don't name it 0.9.5-1, >> please. That would create lots of confusion for both users and >> distribution packagers. > > Good point, I realized that after posting the message. > I don't think 0.9.6 would be a good idea, but 0.9.5b could be used (as > this scheme is already in use for the Windows binary).
Debian is one of the distros that use numbers after the "-" for local changes to an upstream version, packaging changes, etc. Lots of other Debian packages have "a" or "b" or whatever added to the upstream version number without a problem. So I agree that this should work fine. -c -- Chris Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (remove "snip-me." to email) "As a child I understood how to give; I have forgotten this grace since I have become civilized." - Chief Luther Standing Bear
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d