On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 07:56:42 +0100, Vivian wrote in message 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Ampere K. Hardraade wrote
> 
> > Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 7:12 PM
> > To: FlightGear developers discussions
> > Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Problem with ballistic sub-model
> > 
> > On September 16, 2004 01:08 pm, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> > > 
> > > There are some other basic shortcomings as well: the submodel
> > > doesn't inherit the parent accelerations, or the velocities and
> > > accelerations due to roll, pitch and yaw. Only release droptanks
> > > when flying straight and level

..uh, in the real world, this is possible if not permissible, with fun 
consequenses like one or more hard points releases jammed for 
at least a while etc.

> > 
> > They shouldn't inherit accelerations.
> 
> Quite right - they shouldn't. I was getting over enthusiastic there,
> and forgetting my Newtonian physics.

..don't worry, there is also Murphy law physics.  ;-)

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.


_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d

Reply via email to