Beware being like Sony. Invent a new protocol that is better and more
efficient and flexible, and still nobody will use it, though, on the
other hand, nobody uses Sony's protocols (ATRAC-3, Betamax), because
they are eyeballed with patents.

Giles Robertson

-----Original Message-----
From: Arnt Karlsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 23 September 2004 23:04
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] A voice for FG

On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 21:56:50 +0200, Boris wrote in message 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> And there are many more hits regarding the IVAO vs. VATSIM debate.
> 
> Personally, I consider this ridiculous: combining their efforts and
> creating ONE BIG network would benefit EVERYBODY - everything would
> be perfect if they could also initiate opensource development of a
> COMMON protocol that is NOT specific to a particular OS or even
> flight simulator ...

..what happens if _we_ define that common protocol?  ;-)
"FlightGear ATC Protocol"?  (Or is it a SimGear job?)

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.


_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d

_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d

Reply via email to