Selon Jon Stockill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Martin Spott wrote:
> > Martin Spott wrote:
> >>I'm asking just to find out: Do we all agree that it makes much sense
> >>to build the upcoming binary releases with a "crease-patched" version
> >>of current PLIB CVS ?
> > Ahem, for this purpose I'll have put a patched version here within the
> > next couple of minutes that might serve as a reference if people tend
> > to agree :-)
> > ftp://ftp.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Source/plib-20041010-crease.tar.gz
> Another question related to the recent performance increases - did the
> dlists patch make it into the final release?
Yes, and it is mentionned in the NEWS files
Flightgear-devel mailing list