----- Original Message ----- From: "Frederic Bouvier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "FlightGear developers discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 3:15 AM Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] crease patch and Dlists - maybe answer VBOs?
> Selon Roman Grigoriev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Hi guys! > > Dlist can't solve the promplem IMHO > > The right answer is VBO > > I don't understand why you don't want to include this nice feature to > > flightgear > > All modern hardware support them. I wrote them year ago and Erik made a > > patch > > Post that kind of thing on the plib list. Plib is dead now and there is no future on it. IMHO > Display lists are available today and they make a huge difference. Frederic could you please tell me you position about VBOs - include to fgfs or not and Please argument it. But there are some problems in acceleration Dlists between redeons and geforces VBOs support now is good for both vendors There is another HUGE problem in fgfs - tile managment on high speed aircrafts. I wrote it in the list. It needs some time to compile display lists and there are some noticeble delays. when tiles loads. It's ok for 1km DEMs but if you got 100 meters DEMs you got this > > -Fred > > _______________________________________________ > Flightgear-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel > 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d > _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
