On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 00:24:38 +0000, Lee wrote in message 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> On Sunday 21 November 2004 21:58, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 21:32:12 +0000 (UTC), Martin wrote in
> > message
> >
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Lee Elliott wrote:
> > > > I also believe the main gear was designed to tolerate less
> > > > than perfect strips.
> > >
> > > Yes, the main gear looks to be very 'robust'. But I still
> > > wonder why they paid attention to these features. To my
> > > knowledge the TSR-2 was designed for long range and high
> > > cruise speed. This sort of aircraft typically doesn't need
> > > rough, short strips, they could safely operate from distant
> > > bases ....
> >
> > ..you forget this plane was made to fight WWIII.  ;-).
> 
> In a nut shell, you've got it.  The requirements spec was very 
> demanding and to a degree lead to it's failure.
> 
> Even so, albeit after prolonged development, it seems as though 
> it was coming pretty close to actually meeting those 
> requirements when the project was cancelled.  I've read that if 
> just any one of those requirements had been relaxed just a 
> little the a/c would have cost a lot less to produce and been a 
> lot easier to actually manufacture.
> 
> Many, if not most of the people involved in the project seem to 
> believe that it was dropped more for political reasons (it had 
> the potential to upset the balance of powers) rather than 
> technical/manufacturing problems (there have been a surprisingly 
> high number of books written about the TSR2) and considering the 
> original specs & requirements, it's likely that the TSR2 would 
> still be in service today, had they ever got into production and 
> service.

..any books on it's avionics?  These would have needed to be 
reliable near nuclear firework too.

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.


_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d

Reply via email to