"Curtis L. Olson" wrote: > We all are busy. Steve is extremely busy. It doesn't hurt to follow up > on these things (more than once if needed.) If done in a "sensitive" > way, you can usually accomplish reasonable things with reasonable people.
I don't think anyone here is attempting to blame Steve for being extremely busy. The simple question is - trying to get back to the starting point - if it makes sense to hold back valuable improvement in FlightGear just because you rely on a scene graph library where you have to wait several months until 1.) someone is convenient with having a look at your submission and 2.) this submission _might_ show up in a release. I created my private PLIB packages in an attempt to circumvent this 'lock' - until some better solution comes up. These packages carry a 'time stamp' and everyone is free to reference these. > Perhaps as a direct suggestion to the immediate issue of the crease > patch, we should get more FG people onboard as plib contributors with > cvs access so we can make direct contributions and get this fixed? This might be the ultimate solution. Until you/we are there, feel free to rely on the 'intermediate', Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! -------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
