On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:36:57 +0000, Matthew Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just thought that I might be able to get a really nice smooth but
> higher poly model by using nurbs surfaces to model half of the fuselage,
> say. Then I'll convert it to a mesh and duplicate, mirror and join it
> to make the whole thing. Does this sound reasonable?
I experimented with stuff like that early on, but in the end, I found
the most success just building my meshes by hand. For the fuselage, I
usually start with a mesh square in front view, then I split edges and
move vertices until I have a cross-section of the widest part; next, I
switch to side view and duplicate that square forward and backward,
adjusting its height to fit the fuselage side profile; then I go back
to front view and adjust the shapes of the cross-sections (also from
top view, usually), then I connect them all up. A similar approach
works for the wings and horizonatal stabilizer or stabilator.
All the best,
Flightgear-devel mailing list