"Curtis L. Olson" said: > Chris Metzler wrote: > > >Cool. The one thing I'd recommend is including info about development > >status (at the very least, the one-word status that's used in the > >--min-status command line switch). Without it, there will be users > >d'l'ing a plane with great enthusiasm only to be disappointed to find > >that it's in alpha with no panel and no real FDM, etc. > > > > > > Ok, I've add that. So here is a request for help: > > In addition to the <status> tag, I also support a <author> and <version> > tags. It would be great if people could go through and fill in these > fields as they can. Also, I'm happy to take thumbnail.jpg (171x128 > pxls) submissions for any planes that don't have them. If you are the > author of a plane and someone already sent in a thumbnail for your > aircraft, feel free to supercede the original submission with an > official thumbnail for your aircraft. >
Hi Curt, Help is on the way. Doing this has been beckoning me all afternoon, but fortunately family got in the way again ;-). Later tonight and/or in the morning I'll do a bunch. I know quite a few of the authors and have a folder of screen caps. Best, Jim _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
