"Curtis L. Olson" said:
> Chris Metzler wrote:
> >Cool. The one thing I'd recommend is including info about development
> >status (at the very least, the one-word status that's used in the
> >--min-status command line switch). Without it, there will be users
> >d'l'ing a plane with great enthusiasm only to be disappointed to find
> >that it's in alpha with no panel and no real FDM, etc.
> Ok, I've add that. So here is a request for help:
> In addition to the <status> tag, I also support a <author> and <version>
> tags. It would be great if people could go through and fill in these
> fields as they can. Also, I'm happy to take thumbnail.jpg (171x128
> pxls) submissions for any planes that don't have them. If you are the
> author of a plane and someone already sent in a thumbnail for your
> aircraft, feel free to supercede the original submission with an
> official thumbnail for your aircraft.
Help is on the way. Doing this has been beckoning me all afternoon, but
fortunately family got in the way again ;-). Later tonight and/or in the
morning I'll do a bunch. I know quite a few of the authors and have a folder
of screen caps.
Flightgear-devel mailing list