-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Erik Hofman schrieb:
> Christian Mayer wrote:
> 
>> The first point is argueable. But that we need a restart just to change
>> planes is a big show stopper!
> 
> 
> It depends on the goals for 1.0. If you want a version that is easy to
> use for the end user then you might be right. If v1.0 is aimed for a
> completely working standalone simulator program (maybe even certified)
> then it's not such a big deal.
> 
> I guess the 1.0 release is aimed at the first though.

To get it certified the version number itself doesn't matter.

But an end user sees the version number as an indicator if the software
is ready or not. And that's what will be used to measure us. A version
1.0 *must* have an ergonomic UI.

CU,
Christian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFB8NlslhWtxOxWNFcRAu2RAJ0SEqv1eMvtnsDANJllLqBGGwJ/XgCeLC+O
T5DjbmK+pBaTGfSgTCMvqmo=
=TJNa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d

Reply via email to