Frederic Bouvier a écrit :
Erik Hofman wrote :
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
I can revert the patch or someone running windows should provide me a patch instead.
Or do both, because the current patch seems useless. Is it windows specific ?
This one seems better ( move the added block 3 lines upward ) :
cvs -z4 -q diff -u fg_init.cxx (in directory I:\FlightGear\cvs\FlightGear\src\Main\)
Index: fg_init.cxx
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/FlightGear/src/Main/fg_init.cxx,v
retrieving revision 1.116
diff -u -r1.116 fg_init.cxx
--- fg_init.cxx 29 Jan 2005 10:22:44 -0000 1.116
+++ fg_init.cxx 29 Jan 2005 12:56:47 -0000
@@ -340,15 +340,15 @@
}
}
+ if ( aircraft.empty() ) {
+ // Check for $fg_root/system.fgfsrc
+ SGPath sysconf( globals->get_fg_root() );
+ sysconf.append( "system.fgfsrc" );
+ aircraft = fgScanForOption( "--aircraft=", sysconf.str() );
+ }
// if an aircraft was specified, set the property name
if ( !aircraft.empty() ) {
SG_LOG(SG_INPUT, SG_INFO, "aircraft = " << aircraft );
- if ( aircraft.empty() ) {
- // Check for $fg_root/system.fgfsrc
- SGPath sysconf( globals->get_fg_root() );
- sysconf.append( "system.fgfsrc" );
- aircraft = fgScanForOption( "--aircraft=", sysconf.str() );
- }
fgSetString("/sim/aircraft", aircraft.c_str() );
} else {
SG_LOG(SG_INPUT, SG_INFO, "No user specified aircraft, using default" );
_______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
