Hi Melchior, The first sounds right (the confusing "lock"). I'm not sure exactly what the second idea is about. The only thing I can add is if you make that sort of change to the syntax please update all the yasim config files :-)
Best, Jim > From: Melchior FRANZ > > Currently enabling tailwheel-lock actually means to *unlock* it. The meaning > is > reversed, which is a bit confusing. > > Would it be a good idea to change the default for it in > FGControls::FGControls() > and FGControls::reset_all() to "true", and make the FDM configs familiar with > the new concept? (i.e. using YASim's src/dst tags to reverse the meaning, too, > because YASim expects "CASTERING", not "lock".) > > Or should we rename the property to "tailwheel-unlocked"? Or > "tailwheel-castering"? > > Or should we persuade Andy to change the CASTERING keyword to NONCASTERING? > > m. > _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
