Le samedi 11 juin 2005 à 09:24 -0700, Andy Ross a écrit : > Gerard Robin wrote: > > with Yasim we must find a medium way to get the same effect. About > > retractable gears no problems, about contact points on the fuse big > > problems ..... > > I'm not understanding this at all; JSBSim and YASim have all but > identical* gear systems. Can you please post the YASim configuration > you are having trouble with? I suspect you are just misunderstanding > something. > > Are you trying to make the aircraft sit on the automatic contact > points? That won't work, they have very high spring constants and are > designed to detect crashes. You need to define gear objects with > non-tiny compression distances. > > I think the confusion here might be the assumption that you can only > have one set of "gear" and that they must all retract when > /controls/gear-down is set to false. That has never been true with > YASim. > > Andy > > * Differences of which I am aware: JSBSim uses manual contact points, > whereas YASim generates them automatically. JSBSim uses a single > set of retractable gear, whereas YASim allows different gear object > to retract independently. > Since our last talking, i have tried to rebuild from 'souvenirs' the FDM YaSim model which was for me a _big problem_ the result with the actual CVS release is good. Better than before with an older fgfs release (9.4 ??) So now, in addition to the usual retractable gears, with _gear_ which define several contact points, i get a good position of the aircraft (mains gear-up).
Thanks and Sorry for my _certitude_; i was not up to date. Gerard _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
