On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 09:08:05 -0700, Andy wrote in message 

> Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > Andy Ross wrote:
> > > Yeah, but that's a bug.  There is only one manifold pressure.
> > > Surely you don't want *both* "mp-inhg"
> > > and "supercharger-output-inhg", which mean exactly the same
> > > thing.
> >
> > ..I beg to differ; flow always means there are flow losses.
> The discussion was about software, not engines.  If you really
> want to nit, we should be modelling the MP as a 3D scalar field,
> so that the user can decide where to put the probe.  :)

..aye.  ;o)

> The point was that there is no need for a new property to
> represent the value displayed by the manifold pressure gauge.

..agreed, and my point was just "keep open space for code modelling
those losses, until it is written."  

..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.

Flightgear-devel mailing list

Reply via email to