Andy Ross wrote:
Alex Romosan wrote:
Dave Culp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Just curious ... Is there any reason why OpenAl doesn't offer stable
probably because it's still under development? on their web page
(openal.org) they say they are migrating to openal 1.1 specifications.
as such i would expect some changes in the api.
This is still bad, though. One would expect a version 1.1 API to
remain backwards compatible with the 1.0 API.
They are going to make sure this is the case, the 1.x line should be
compatible with the previous releases. This was just a mistake which
will be corrected shortly. Anyhow, it's just an alut problem which I
would like to remove anyhow. This is already done for the main program,
just not for the test applications.
Flightgear-devel mailing list