Karsten Krispin wrote:
> If you are able to turn something, that fgfs get compiled with 2.3.2, the
> chances are probably better to provide a working binary! - I also can bake my
> own fgfs. But that wasn't your intention, I assume.
Exactly, I was investigating if this would be a valid platform to
create FlightGear release binaries. This isn't my machine so I have
very little chance to turn anything.
Thanks for responding,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
