Oke I understood all the comments. I'll adapt them.
Thanks for the explanations.
Cheers,
Dick
Citeren Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Friday 14 October 2005 10:23:
Title, well I just thought it was nice to insert a title.
Agreed. :-)
Version number and deletion of link: I'm always a bit frustrated
when I open a
document and read that it has last been updated 4 years ago, with a
link in the document that don't work anymore.
Removing the link was a good idea. But changing the version number was
just cosmetics, and actually a lie: it doesn't magically make the document
describe "0.9.8 or greater". I find this actually more frustrating. From
an old date/version number I can at least see *why* the contents are all
wrong. ;-)
At the company where I work as an IT guy if we update someone's work we add
ourselves as the author so that people can see who are the authors and ask
questions about the document to the new author also.
I would still not call that "author". Just editor. And I know this only
as adding a copyright line with appropriate date, and mostly in source
code. This isn't normally done in fgfs documents AFAIK. There's ususally only
one -- the real -- author named in the documents. All fgfs developers that
edit the file can be found in the cvs log and are of no interest to the
reader.
m.
--
"Faust", New Author: Melchior FRANZ (Former Author: Johann W. von GOETHE :-)
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
