Erik Hofman wrote:
Yes, that's the code.
I now have a fully working version without any of the affected code,
just a routine which was written by Curtis anyhow.
How should we proceed at this point; add it prior to 0.9.9, or add it
for 1.0 and provide a patch for 0.9.9?
Erik,
If you could run the clock forward a year or two or five or 10 and
verify that the new code matches the results of the existing code within
acceptable tolerences, then I think I'd be ok with sneaking it into v0.9.9
Curt.
--
Curtis Olson http://www.flightgear.org/~curt
HumanFIRST Program http://www.humanfirst.umn.edu/
FlightGear Project http://www.flightgear.org
Unique text: 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
