>   I've tried to compile FG with this patches. But there is a problem

Dear Ladislaw,
thank you very much for your help in testing this.

> to compile it because
> no errno is declared in those files.
> I don't know, how it is mentioned, I'm not up to the code. I don't
> know how to fix it cleanly. So please, can you post the correction?
>  Thank you.

Please back the changes out. I am about to post a shortened version, as
per the comments by Melchior, without the MT problems issues, and without
the errno at this time. It will not use any explicitly static exception
objects, even in the case where the whole exception object could be made
static w/o ever changing it (i.e., when there's no per-throw data change
of the exception).

(I'm preserving the errno and the fully static hunks aside, they're not
lost).

Since you are running on a different platform than I do (I have the errno
there), I would like to ask you to run the exception checking snippet in
this thread and report the results, while I'm doing the final testing of
the shortened patch.

> BTW. Paste the patch into the body of email is not good idea. I have
> to edit it manualy, because tabs and some spaces were lost. I don't
> know how, maybe it is a "feature" of gmail. I'd prefer an attached
> file.

The problem is that some list archives don't store the attachments.
I'll now include URLs to a backup of the patches on my site instead
of pointing to the mailing list archives, for people like you that
prefer direct binary download of a patch over piping an email through
to a patch(1) pipeline.

Vassilii


_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d

Reply via email to