Martin Spott wrote: > > Doing things right (TM) is always an appealing argument. The real world > has voice ATC communication, so doing things right would imply doing > the same in FlightGear as well. But "doing things right" is not the > point here. In fact I know several people who use MSFS right because > there is the ability to do voice ATC, people who do flying in real life > as well. Personally I'm convinced we'll learn to run pretty quickly > once we have legs that also feature the "running" mode.
Still another point: even if nobody intended to try and implement this stuff until much later, maybe it's worth considering now just to make sure that changes to the software between now and then don't make it *impossible* to implement later. In this case, "doing things right" may mean considering it now just enough to determine what architectural qualities must be preserved through the other code changes that occur, and thus what other contributed code should *not* do. -c ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
