Hi,
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 23:00, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> and what about declaring SGReference'd class destructor as protected and
> SGSharedPtr<T> as friend ? That way, it will not be possible to call
> delete explicitely.
Not sure, but I believe this is not sufficient since the SGReferenced d'tor
will be called from the derived class d'tor. If that one is public, I believe
that we can still delete the derived one.
But sure, would be good to have. Still thinking about that ...
greetings
Mathias
--
Mathias Fröhlich, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
