* Martin Spott -- Friday 03 March 2006 11:59:
> Ah, you actually _did_ understand ? It didn't look like that. So why
> then do you prefer being ignorant ?
No, that's a misunderstanding. Let me clear it up:
1) we were not discussing a new keyboard layout
2) we were not discussing what binding should be on the n/N key
3) we were not discussing on which key propeller-pitch should be
4) and least of all were we discussing where to put bindings for
not yet implemented functions
propeller-pitch *is* already on n/N for 5 aircraft[1] (which is a lot
if you ask me), and used by another 12 aircraft in cvs[2]. The discussion
was not about *changing* the key binding, but only about making it global.
I didn't ignore your order, but I consider it unreasonable at this
point. You seem to have decided for yourself already, that n/N must
be *changed*(!) to "carburetor heat" *now*, because changing it later
would be bad!? Let's wait until we need a carburetor heat binding.
Maybe we have redesigned the whole keyboard layout a few times until
then, after all that's suggested at least twice every year -- mostly
by people who haven't moved a finger for the keyboard layout before
and after that.
m.
[1] c182, c310, hurricaneIIb, seafireIIIc, spitfireIIa
[2] Aerostar-700, Boeing314, Citation, Lockheed1049, TU-114, b1900d,
b29, beech99, dc3, dhc2, p51d, pa24-250
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
