On 08/03/06, James Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does this require a CDATA section, the same as when JavaScript is embedded > into (X)HTML? Since obviously may Nasal characters would confuse a > validating XML parser....
While this won't come up often, it's important to remember that the literal string "]]>" will mess up an XML CDATA section. As Melchoir suggested, escaping '<' with < and '&' with & is often a simpler choice, as long as it doesn't happen enough to get annoying (there's no need to escape '>' as '>' in character data, though many people do just to be consistent). All the best, David -- http://www.megginson.com/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
