Vassilii Khachaturov wrote: >> want to have a look at OpenPBX once the 0.2 release is out. I _suspect_ >> there will be better "conference" support for OpenPBX because the >> fathers of Asterisk at Digium always tried to firmly couple conference >> support to the presence of one of their interface boards .... > > That would suck if it's still true for the current asterisk --
There _is_ a conference tool "app_conference" for Asterisk that works without hardware, but it is, as you could expect, not - hmmmm - very much 'promoted' by the principal Asterisk supporters :-) They claim that accurate timing and synchronisation between multiple channels would not be possible without the use of one of their interferace cards which then would serve as clock reference, so "app_meetme" requires one of their boards. I think with NTP these days any desired accuracy of time reference should be poosible: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+app_conference >From reading some changelogs I remember there is a conference application developed right _in_ OpenPBX which is independent from hardware .... aaaah, look here: http://trac.openpbx.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/browser/openpbx/trunk/apps/conference/ I can't wait to put such a server in use once a release is available but I'm not sure if I will have enough time to spend on this, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
