> > If the JSBSim version simply removed the exception throws without
> > compensating with some other kind of mechanism, then I can see how
> > you'd run into a lot of problems.  I don't have a copy of the JSBSim
> > code on my computer to check.
>
> Having a quick look at
> http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/jsbsim/JSBSim/src/simgear/xml/
>
> we can see that there is a "easyxml.cpp" with return statements, and a
> "easyxml.cxx" without ( note the extensions ). The former is
> newer than the
> latter. Unfortunately, Makefile.am contains a reference to
> easyxml.cxx ( the wrong one ).
>
> -Fred


Huh!?  I'm drawing a total blank. I don't recall anything about easyxml.cpp.
That file is going to be "toast" very shortly. Ignore it. If I have to make
changes to the .cxx file, so be it. But I don't want multiple files like
that in cvs. I don't recall at all what that is about.

Jon



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to