On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 17:16:26 -0400, Rob wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > > > > Bittorrent is faster when it comes to distributing large files. > > > Also it doesn't have a search engine (though some clients do, but > > > it's not the same as eMule). > > > > ..ok, details or urls so I can form an informed opinion? > > > > - > > > Sorry I should have posted this: > > "BitTorrent transfers are typically very fast, because all nodes in a > group concentrate on transferring a single file or collection of > files. While the original eDonkey2000 client provided little "leech > resistance", most new clients have some sort of system to encourage > uploaders. eMule<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EMule>, > for example, has a credits system whereby a client rewards other > clients that upload to it by increasing their priority in its queue. > However, the nature of the eDonkey2000 concept means download speeds > tend to be much more variable, although the number of available files > is far greater." > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bittorrent#Comparison_to_other_file_sharing_systems > > also from my own experience, Bittorrent is much faster than eMule. ..ok, MOI "_if_ p2p, then BT." -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
