Hello Ben,
bsupnik wrote:
> Martin Spott wrote:
>> 100 08x 49 02 2 0.25 1 2 1 35.04420900 -106.59855700 300 200 3 2 1 1 2 \
>> 2 3.00 35.04420900 -106.59855700 0000 0300 3 2 0 1 1 2 3.50
>>
>> How is this gonna work when the thresholds of the opposing runway ends
>> are situated at the same location ? Shouldn't the meaning of the cited
>> text be "The following _columns ...." ?
>
> This appears to be a zero-meters-long runway. :-) I think this is
> simply a bad example in Robin's spec. The lat/lon pairs for the runway
> ends really should (must?) be different.
It would be extremely nice to have at least one single, completely
working example that really matches the proposed spec. This would
significantly help to understand the schema by having a means to
cross-check what I've grasped from the idea behind the new spec.
Until then it's really difficult to tell if the new schema actually
delivers what I'd expect from it or not - or at least to tell if the
schema is comprehensive enough to derive missing information.
Thanks,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
